![]() I started this thread to verify where the correct spot is supposed to be to tune them for that reason, not so people can debate default aircraft and ATC capabilities in general. Transponder code 2000 is set until re-entering radar controlled airspace. wrong frequency on the aircraft radio have an ATC facility radio failure. The VHF radios are then set to 121.5 (guard), 123.45 (air to air), and the company ops frequency. We tried to check-in on the new frequency several times, but were blocked by. It had been difficult, too, for me to relinquish control of the radios, as during my entire flying career I had controlled my own transmissions. Because letting ATC change it was not updating the radio panel in the A320 I thought maybe I was missing something and maybe tuning things in the wrong spot. About 150 to 200 miles beyond the coast, ATC terminates radar service and advises the flight to switch over to HF position reporting. I started this thread because while the default ATC can tune it for you, I'm trying to learn to do it manually finally so I can get into vatsim flying. While I would like to see more functionality and features included (e.g, VNAV), I don't expect expect an FSLABS A-320 level sim in this default airplane. You will get nowhere fast trying to present the FSX A321 as being more realistic than the MSFS one. I don't recall the FSX A321 having anything more than the default FSX autopilot, let alone an FMC (even one that is not fully functional), high AOA envelope protection, bank angle protection, managed/selected nav and altitude modes, etc. You will get nowhere fast trying to present the FSX A321 as being more complete, bug-free, or realistic than the MSFS one. We use a 1 to 5 scale so the correct response would be. In Australia where I am that would not be correct. I don't recall the FSX A321 having anything more than the default FSX autopilot, let alone an FMC (even one that is not fully functional), high AOA envelope protection, bank angle protection, managed/selected nav and altitude modes, etc. Messages: 5 Display name: Greg Hi, In US airspace, when asked by an Approach Controller for a Radio Check what an appropriate response The response I heard was. But even in the case where I would use the MSFS ATC, since it automatically switches you to the correct frequency in the ATC window, I also couldn't care less about what frequency shows in the radio display. I'm also normally a VATSIM flyer, so I couldn't care less about this issue. USC 47 301 in general is all about 'transmission of energy', or broadcasting. ![]() In any case, I agree with your previous message that this less than even minor bug is the very least of my concerns. Radio check and taxi clearanceLeaving The Circuit Aerodrome tower, GABCD with information ATIS letter request radio check & Taxi instructions. Your receiver must comply with USC 47 302a, the law that says, 'you cant interfere with other equipment'. ![]() Not sure what "keep founding this kind of software" means. If having some broken functions compared to the old FSX doesn't bother you, keep founding this kind of software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |